Parker (w) and Pagulayan and Alves (a)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27366/273663a1ec4edc8dd7b9cfb08f427904bef2c690" alt=""
At the end of last issue, she changed from her still-humanlike Red Hulk form into a far more Hulk-like form after being set upon by enhanced super-soldiers of the "Echelon Project," designed solely to make more superhumans but apparently actually working (unlike so many other projects like this). When she looked like she would lose the fight, Machine Man notes, she turns more Hulk and thus loses more of herself. The Echelon Project leader contains her before Machine Man frees her and whisks her away to give her a chance to power down. She goes full human and explains to Machine Man what exactly is going on with her. There's a great sense, to build on the inhibitions idea in various Hulk forms, that very different things matter to her as Betty Ross and as Red She-Hulk. As Red She-Hulk, she's very upset at an ancient, hidden pyramid that stole her "BIG-%#& SWORD." When she follows leads about what could have happened in the pyramid, now as Betty Ross, she's more intrigued by the mystery and less attached to the sword.
It's a great idea, one that's both inherent to the Hulk mythology and a bit warped for her purposes. She is certainly a different Hulk than the others, though she shares the same powers. For regular Hulk, there's no middle ground stage. He's either Banner or he's Hulk. There's still a sense of Banner within Hulk, to varying degrees depending on the writer or the time or whatever magics they apply to him, but it's never as pronounced as with Red She-Hulk, or even regular type She-Hulk, for that matter. That's always been a weird sticking point for me about the Hulks; She-Hulk far prefers the Hulk side of her and doesn't shy away. Certainly she's lost control in the past and will do it again in the future, no doubt, but there's never been the sort of feeling of a totally changed person. Meanwhile, Hulk is typically very much one or the other. This issue of Red She-Hulk helps explain away a good amount of that, with different degrees of Hulking. It's a very good idea put to good use here. Machine Man is a solid character dug up from depths of Marvel for it. The art in the book is very strong in its action and settings, which are varied and they're beginning to delve into the recently storied history of SHIELD. Overall, solid book on what has so far been a solid title. Worth reading.
Punisher: Nightmare 1
Gimple (w) and Texeira (a)
I'm not really a Punisher guy. I never have been. I've always kind of thought he's been a one-trick pony and I hate that. It's also why I hate when people who don't know Captain America try to portray Captain America. In video games, he's always like "These colors don't run!" and "I've been fighting since before you were born!" We get it, video game developers, he's got a flag on his chest. That's kind of the first thing we saw. But to people who know Cap, there's more there than just crazy patriotism. In fact, crazy patriotism isn't really there (despite the flag bit). With Punisher, it's always been "these guys are bad, I'm bad too, but a different kind, so I'll kill them."
Here's the inherent hypocrisy of that, in case you didn't catch it. I like Cap because I read deeper than his costume. I don't like Punisher because I don't. I've read maybe 15 books total that really have to do with Punisher, and half of those are from the perspective of other characters (his Civil War appearances, when he jumps into Daredevil, etc.). I don't know how much goes on between the costume. I will say, in my defense, that just about every one of those books did follow the same formula. I will also say, against my defense, that I was compelled enough to read on then denounced Punisher as a weak character EACH TIME. As this blog continues, I hope to stay on top of just about every Marvel book. That will include a heavy dose of Punisher. I've read some of this most recent series, Greg Rucka's take, and I've been at least willing to keep going in many cases. So we'll see if any of this changes.
On to Punisher: Nightmare 1. We get a lot of Punisher backstory here (which, despite my distaste for the character, I do know already) and so it kind of drags a bit to readers who know. Still, it works well enough as it's interspersed with fragments of his non-origin story past and with the way the origin story scene plays in his head on a constant loop. It's also important to have it there in terms of building this story, introducing a new character who is going through almost exactly what Castle went through when he became Punisher. Another war vet, wife and kid, finally home from the war and his family gets murdered in the crossfire of a gang assassination. This one had some issues in the war differentiating between the good guy he was and the murderer he could be on the battlefield. I'm not sure if that parallels Castle's war days (where I know he was a good soldier and he must have learned a whole bunch, but I'm not sure if he was as kill-happy as Johnny) but it certainly parallels his once-days and his now-days. Gimple and Texeira paint a good picture of Castle-now as the Johnny persona, the murderer person of John Niman. Castle-then was likely more like John's J persona, the diplomat, the intelligent family man. There are two extremes with Frank, before Punisher and Punisher. Johnny is both in one. It's an interesting concept and I'll keep with the book because personality interests me. Even if I've written Punisher off as having a one-track personality, it's still a personality of a sort and examining it from all sides is something that intrigues me.
Iron Man 3 Prelude 1
Gage (w) and Kurth (a)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/073ea/073ea747c114f53e9c5734c34483169660dd0684" alt=""
One of the more interesting bits to me is that there's an Avengers tie-in sequence in here too. Though it's certainly a nod to the blockbuster and ground-shattering movie, it's used more as an explanation to Rhodes' whereabouts during the event. It's a question that didn't ever come up to me until I saw it in this issue, but where WAS Rhodey? You'd think that another Iron Man suit would be invaluable in that attack on New York and the army would certainly send him. This issue explains that he's just cleared up a hostage situation in Asia and, even at supersonic speeds, it would take him hours to get to New York and then he gets attacked by what appear to be more Mandarin forces ANYWAY.
Take this issue for what it is. It's providing some sort of backstory for the Marvel Cinematic Universe and doesn't really tie in to the Marvel 616. Still, Gage is a good writer and makes the story interesting and answers some questions about that Universe. It's somewhat fun because, though the characters resemble their 616 counterparts, there are clear differences and this kind of book allows the writer and the artist to render their own interpretation of that character. Not a bad book. If you're looking to get into comics and your way in is the movie, this would be a great way to jump in. Something with characters you're familiar with and where you don't feel like you need the decades of history to understand the comic. This just requires knowing about a couple movies you probably already know about. It's not so bad for a full-on comic fan too; good writing, good art, intriguing story. Better than a lot of movie tie-in books, for sure.
No comments:
Post a Comment